Skip to content
The Catholic Leader
  • Home
  • News
    • QLD
    • Australia
    • Regional
    • Education
    • World
    • Vatican
  • Features
  • Opinion
  • Life
    • Family
    • Relationships
    • Faith
  • Culture
  • People
  • Subscribe
  • Jobs
  • Contribute
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • QLD
    • Australia
    • Regional
    • Education
    • World
    • Vatican
  • Features
  • Opinion
  • Life
    • Family
    • Relationships
    • Faith
  • Culture
  • People
  • Subscribe
  • Jobs
  • Contribute
No Result
View All Result
The Catholic Leader
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Bioethicist Doctor Ray Campbell writes it is important to understand what euthanasia is not

byGuest Contributor
31 May 2019 - Updated on 1 April 2021
Reading Time: 5 mins read
AA

Understanding transgender: Bioethicist Dr Ray Campbell. Photo: Libby Blom.

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Understanding euthanasia: Bioethicist Dr Ray Campbell. Photo: Libby Blom.

I REMEMBER having a conversation with an intensive care doctor who told how when a patient was admitted to intensive care the family would frequently say “we want you to do all that you can for …”  

The doctor doubted that they understood what “do all that you can” might mean, and that “doing all that you can” might not be the best care for the patient.

When it comes to “end of life” decision-making there is often a lack of understanding regarding our duty of care.  

Sometimes this misunderstanding is exploited in debates about euthanasia and assisted suicide.  

In what follows I am not so much concerned with what is euthanasia, but what is not euthanasia.  

Some people, including many Catholics, might be surprised to know that we are not obliged to do “all that we can” in order to preserve life – our own, or someone else’s.

Often it is quite appropriate not to do something that might prolong a person’s life.

I begin with a general ethical principle regarding respect for human life.  

In the context of health care we can express that principle as follows: “If a person is ill he or she is obliged to seek help to maximise their chances of recovery and to minimise the effects of chronic disability or handicap. If illness is life-threatening a person should seek to avert the threat.”

This duty is founded upon the fact that human life is a basic human good to be respected and cared for.

Related Stories

People opt for euthanasia ‘out of fear’ of being a burden

Brisbane Catholic doctor voicing the risks and unsafe aspects of VAD laws

Everyone has a right to life, not a right to death, pope says

The negative norm, which I would consider a moral absolute, is: You should not directly attack the good of life – there is no such thing as a life unworthy of life. Euthanasia and assisted suicide obviously disregard this moral norm which has been integral to the mores of our society for centuries.

The positive duty rules out one kind of bad practice, what is referred to as “under-treatment”.  

“Under-treatment” can be defined as the failure to take appropriate measures to treat symptoms or the condition itself, when those measures could bring real relief and are not considered too burdensome or intrusive.

The language that is often used here to justify lack of treatment is that of futility.  

A treatment is futile when the treatment does not achieve its purpose.  

So if the treatment is aimed at cure, when cure is no longer possible, then that is futile treatment.  

Sometimes the continuation of chemotherapy, for example, may be futile because of the progression of the cancer.  

Artificial nutrition is aimed at giving nutrition. 

But if the body processes have already begun to break down such that food is no longer being digested, then artificial nutrition is futile as it is not achieving its purpose.

Also there are limits to our positive duty.  

Just as there is no obligation to pursue futile treatment, so there is no obligation, other things being equal, to undergo treatment that imposes excessive hardship or burden.  Burdensomeness might be physical, psychological (including cultural and personal sensibilities), moral, or economic.   

In the Catholic tradition we have often referred to “ordinary” and “extraordinary” means of treatment.  

For the moralists burdensomeness has in fact been the central criterion in determining whether a “means” is ordinary or extraordinary, i.e. whether a treatment is obligatory or optional. 

Pope Pius XII in a famous address to an international Congress of Anaesthetists in 1957 (Nov 24) invoked the distinction between ordinary and extraordinary means saying: “normally one is held to use only ordinary means – according to circumstances of persons, places, times and culture – that is to say, means that do not involve any grave burden for oneself or another”.  

The Declaration on Euthanasia from the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith also recognises that the term “extraordinary” is imprecise. 

In giving guidelines it says “one cannot impose on anyone the obligation to have recourse to a technique which is already in use but which carries a risk or is burdensome” and “when inevitable death is imminent … it is permitted in conscience to take the decision to refuse forms of treatment that would only secure a precarious and burdensome prolongation of life …”  

So what constitutes burdensomeness?

In judging how burdensome treatment is, we need to consider  the degree of risk, cost, and physical and psychological hardship involved relative to (a) this particular patient, his or her overall condition and its potential for improvement, the patient’s resources and sensibilities (e.g. to the burdens of his or her family), and (b) to this particular doctor (or medical team), their time, effort and other obligations.

Throughout history a great variety of things have been considered burdensome enough to constitute extraordinary means such as: leaving one’s home to go to a more healthful climate; the amputation of a limb; other major operations; and very costly treatments.   In many situations, “resuscitation” after cardiac arrest might be considered too burdensome for many patients. 

We cannot draw up a list and say, “That’s it. Everything that’s on that list will be considered burdensome”. 

It is the individual patient (or the competent person speaking on their behalf) who, having been properly informed by the medical staff as to what the treatment involves and what the likely prognosis is, must decide whether it is too burdensome for him or her.

This is also the problem with Advance Health Care Directives following the Queensland model. 

They are a blunt instrument making decisions in complex and unforeseen circumstances.  

It is much better to appoint an enduring power of attorney, who knows your preferences, to speak on your behalf if you are no longer competent to do so.

The bottom line is – it is not euthanasia to forgo possibly life-prolonging treatment which is overly burdensome.  

Such a decision is not an attack upon the good of human life, but an acceptance of the reasonable limits of medicine.  

Dr Ray Campbell is a Brisbane ethicist.

ShareTweet
Previous Post

Indigenous hopes rising with the appointment of Ken Wyatt to leadership at the highest level

Next Post

Apologist and podcaster Matt Fradd wants to lead people to Christ and dig deep into ‘weird’ topics

Guest Contributor

Related Posts

Hot Topics

People opt for euthanasia ‘out of fear’ of being a burden

6 April 2022
Doctors make ‘dramatic mistakes’, physician warns ahead of Queensland euthanasia vote
QLD

Brisbane Catholic doctor voicing the risks and unsafe aspects of VAD laws

13 March 2022
Life: Pope Francis embraces a woman during his general audience in the Paul VI hall. Photo: CNS
Vatican

Everyone has a right to life, not a right to death, pope says

10 February 2022
Next Post

Apologist and podcaster Matt Fradd wants to lead people to Christ and dig deep into 'weird' topics

Canossian Sister Rosa Vazzano explains why she takes off her shoes before she meets holy ground

Brisbane parish priest charged with an historic count of sexual abuse

Popular News

  • Pregnant woman

    Queensland election: The pro-life political parties committed to abortion law reforms

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Answering God’s invitation to us all

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Here are the stories of 10 new saints being canonised this Sunday

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Br Alan Moss remembered for a life of faith and learning

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Nationwide rosary event happening for Australia’s patroness this Saturday

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
Search our job finder
No Result
View All Result

Latest News

Gwen has given 15,000 hours of cuddles to sick and premature babies
QLD

Gwen has given 15,000 hours of cuddles to sick and premature babies

by Joe Higgins
20 May 2022
0

BRISBANE grandmother Gwendoline Grant has clocked up 15,000 hours cuddling and caring for sick and premature babies...

Helping stroke survivors earns Ozcare volunteer national recognition

Helping stroke survivors earns Ozcare volunteer national recognition

20 May 2022
Br Alan Moss remembered for a life of faith and learning

Br Alan Moss remembered for a life of faith and learning

19 May 2022
Catholic relationship advisers offer five tips to look after your mental health

Nationwide rosary event happening for Australia’s patroness this Saturday

19 May 2022
Francis offers advice on politics: Seek unity, don’t get lost in conflict

Francis offers advice on politics: Seek unity, don’t get lost in conflict

19 May 2022

Never miss a story. Sign up to the Weekly Round-Up
eNewsletter now to receive headlines directly in your email.

Sign up to eNews
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

The Catholic Leader is an Australian award-winning Catholic newspaper that has been published by the Archdiocese of Brisbane since 1929. Our journalism seeks to provide a full, accurate and balanced Catholic perspective of local, national and international news while upholding the dignity of the human person.

Copyright © All Rights Reserved The Catholic Leader
Accessibility Information | Privacy Policy | Archdiocese of Brisbane

The Catholic Leader acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people as the First Peoples of this country and especially acknowledge the traditional owners on whose lands we live and work throughout the Catholic Archdiocese of Brisbane.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • QLD
    • Australia
    • Regional
    • Education
    • World
    • Vatican
  • Features
  • Opinion
  • Life
    • Family
    • Relationships
    • Faith
  • Culture
  • People
  • Subscribe
  • Jobs
  • Contribute

Copyright © All Rights Reserved The Catholic Leader

0
    0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyChoose another Subscription
    Continue Shopping